Editor's Note: This article, from 1991, references "The institute." The Atlas Society was orginially founded as the Institute for Objectivist Studies.
And not by eastern windows only,
When daylight comes, comes in the light,
In front, the sun climbs slow, how slowly,
But westward, look, the land is bright.
-Arthur Hugh Clough
June 1, 1991 -- Ideas are the primary source of a society's culture and political life, and we look to intellectual change as the path to freedom, individualism, and a culture in which our values will be honored.
History throws this connection into bold relief. With the accuracy of hindsight, and a vantage point that lets us take in centuries at a sweep, we observe how the ideas that flourished in the Renaissance and Age of Reason led to the Enlightenment and its political reforms, and then to the Industrial Revolution.
But those who are fighting for the emergence of new ideas do not have this perspective. The dawn of a new age is a slow and cloudy affair, and it's sometimes hard to see what difference we are making. Objectivist ideas remain far outside the academic mainstream. The universities are filled with an ugly nihilism. Politicians keep repeating the mantras of the welfare state.
Nevertheless, we are not living in the Dark Ages. Communism is in collapse around the globe, as one country after another revolts against the naked threats and empty promises of collectivism. Free-market ideas are in the ascendancy throughout the West. Tax revolts seem to have put an upper limit on the growth of government.
In the universities, radicals have been trying to impose affirmative action on the curriculum, downplaying the great works of Western civilization in the name of "diversity." They have tried to impose speech codes to prevent blasphemy against the egalitarian faith. But they have run into fierce resistance from an increasing number of scholars who are beginning to grasp what is at stake. "Political correctness" has been denounced by many prominent academics, including the presidents of Harvard and Yale.
Outside the universities, the economy offers considerable scope for entrepreneurial ambition, especially in the fields of computers and communications. Indeed, by automating the use of information, pioneers in these fields are fomenting a technological revolution whose effects on human well-being may rival those of the Industrial Revolution.
The intellectual revolt against the Enlightenment that began two centuries ago has run its course. The ideas that spawned the revolt have nowhere left to go, and their effects hang on only by default. The ideas that will replace them are still fighting for acceptance. Intellectually, the sun is still on the horizon. But the land is bright with possibility.
We at the Institute believe that Ayn Rand is the philosopher of the new age, and we are committed to the task of extending her ideas and making them better known. The Journal will be a progress report to our members and friends. We'll let you know what we are doing: the courses, seminars, and colloquia we are offering and the research projects we have undertaken, as well as the activities of scholars and others who are associated with the Institute. We'll describe the signs of hope we see in politics, in culture, in the realm of ideas. And we'll address questions about how to interpret Objectivist ideas, and apply them to our lives.
Our efforts are made possible by the generous support of our members. The response to our membership drive has exceeded all expectations, and confirmed our sense that the time is right for the venture we've undertaken. We are grateful for contributions at all levels, but a special vote of thanks goes to our Founding Contributors, who have donated $500 or more.
We hope, finally, that communication will run in both directions. Let us know what you think.
Originally Published in IOS Journal Volume 1 Number 1 • Summer 1991
大衛·凱利(David Kelley)於1990年創立了阿特拉斯協會(The Atlas Society),並在2016年之前一直擔任執行董事。此外,作為首席智力官,他負責監督組織製作的內容:文章、視頻、會議上的演講等。他於2018年從TAS退休,仍然活躍於TAS專案,並繼續在董事會任職。
凱利是一位專業的哲學家、教師和作家。1975年獲得普林斯頓大學哲學博士學位后,他加入了瓦薩學院哲學系,教授各級課程。他還曾在布蘭迪斯大學教授哲學,並經常在其他校區講課。
凱利的哲學著作包括倫理學、認識論和政治學方面的原創作品,其中許多作品以新的深度和新的方向發展了客觀主義思想。他是認識論論文《感官的證據》的作者;客觀主義中的真理與寬容,論客觀主義運動中的問題;粗獷的個人主義:仁慈的自私基礎;以及《推理的藝術》,這是一本廣泛使用的入門邏輯教科書,現已出版第 5 版。
凱利曾就廣泛的政治和文化主題發表演講和出版。他關於社會問題和公共政策的文章發表在 《哈珀斯》、《科學》、《理性》、《哈佛商業評論》、《弗里曼》、《論原則》等雜誌上。在1980年代,他經常為 《巴倫週刊》財經和商業雜誌 撰寫有關平等主義、移民、最低工資法和社會保障等問題的文章。
他的著作 《一個人的生活:個人權利和福利國家》 批判了福利國家的道德前提,並捍衛了維護個人自主、責任和尊嚴的私人替代方案。1998年,他出現在約翰·斯托塞爾(John Stossel)的ABC/TV特別節目“貪婪”中,引發了一場關於資本主義倫理的全國性辯論。
作為國際公認的客觀主義專家,他廣泛地講授安·蘭德、她的思想和作品。他是電影《阿特拉斯聳聳肩》的顧問,也是《阿特拉斯聳聳肩:小說、電影、哲學》的編輯。
“概念與自然:對現實主義轉向的評論(道格拉斯·拉斯穆森和道格拉斯·登厄伊爾)”,《理性論文》第 42 期,第 1 期,(2021 年夏季);這篇對最近一本書的評論包括對概念的本體論和認識論的深入探討。
知識的基礎。關於客觀主義認識論的六講。
“存在的首要地位”和“感知的認識論”,傑斐遜學院,聖地牙哥,1985年7月
“普遍性和歸納”,在GKRH會議上的兩次演講,達拉斯和安娜堡,1989年3月
“懷疑論”,約克大學,多倫多,1987年
“自由意志的本質”,波特蘭研究所的兩場演講,1986年10月
“現代性黨”,卡托政策報告,2003年5月/6月; 導航員,2003年11月;一篇被廣泛引用的文章,關於前現代、現代(啟蒙)和後現代觀點之間的文化分歧。
"I Don't Have To" (IOS Journal, Volume 6, Number 1, April 1996) and “I Can and I Will” (The New Individualist, Fall/Winter 2011); Companion pieces on making real the control we have over our lives as individuals.