標籤
哲學史

哲學史

David Potts on Derrida's "Of Grammatology"

The following is a summary of Derrida’s thought as presented in Part I, Chapter 1, of his book Of Grammatology. This book is apparently the

2011-2-28
|
大衛·波茨
6 分鐘
肖恩·克萊因的回應

威爾·托馬斯的評論文章抓住了德里達這篇非常困難的作品的大部分精髓。我特別欣賞他對 decon 的評論

2011-2-28
|
肖恩·克萊因
4 分鐘
福柯有論據嗎?

I was quite impressed with David L. Potts’s review of Foucault, as I was impressed with the criticisms he raised against my own discussion..

2011-2-28
|
Bryan Register
5
Deconstructing Derrida: Review of "Structure, Sign and Discourse in the Human Sciences"

The first impulse a reader is likely to have upon starting to read chapter 10 is to close the book in dismay and disgust. The sentences appe

2011-2-28
|
米哈爾·弗拉姆·科恩
9 分
Artificiality in Heidegger

In his outstanding review essay , Roger Donway makes several references to things’ identities being “artificial.” By this he seems to mean

2011-2-27
|
大衛·波茨
5 分鐘
傑米·梅爾韋的回應

這篇評論是阿特拉斯協會1999年在線「網路研討會」的一部分,題為“後現代主義的大陸起源”。

2011-2-27
|
傑米·梅爾韋
2 分鐘
福柯的性取向

據我瞭解,福柯是後現代主義被廣泛認可的創造者之一。他受到黑格爾和尼采的影響,他

2011-2-27
|
威廉·戴爾
10 分鐘
福柯的知識與力量

正確解釋蜜雪兒·福柯在《性的歷史:引言》(“HSI”,Vintage Books,1990年;首次出版)中的陳述

2011-2-27
|
大衛·波茨
10 分鐘
Heidegger's Attempt to Redeem Metaphysics

這篇評論是阿特拉斯協會1999年在線「網路研討會」的一部分,題為“後現代主義的大陸起源”。

Feb 26, 2011
|
10 分鐘
Getting a Grip on Nothing

I want to lay out what I understand to be the basic structure of the argument, along the way dealing with some misunderstandings to which

Feb 21, 2011
|
Bryan Register
9 分
海德格爾的達賽因概念

Bryan suggested that we might find his reading of “What Is Metaphysics?” too Sartrean; I confess I did find it so. I was particularly

Feb 21, 2011
|
6 分鐘
Logical Positivism vs. Objectivism

Contrary to logical positivism, the cognitive meaning of a statement is not equal to its means of verification. Instead, the meaning of a...

2011-1-26
|
Richard Shedenhelm
3 分鐘
Humanism vs. Objectivism

Humanism is the doctrine that there is only the real world, that reason is our means of knowledge, and that human well-being in this life is

2011-1-26
|
2
Liberalism vs. Objectivism

Ayn Rand criticized both the “liberal” Left and the “conservative” Right poles of American politics. She identified both major political

2011-1-26
|
5 分鐘
自由意志主義——湯瑪斯對施瓦茨和佩科夫公平嗎?

Peter Schartz was not simply referring to the Libertarian party. See his " On Moral Sanctions ," in which he discusses the question "...

2011-1-26
|
2 分鐘
Existentialism and Ayn Rand

Existentialism is not a very unified school of thought. The main existentialists—Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Sartre—disagree

2011-1-25
|
J. Raibley
6 分鐘
Criticisms of Objectivism

Ayn Rand was a radical thinker, i.e., one who went to the root of long-standing philosophical problems. She was self-consciously opposed to

2011-1-25
|
2 分鐘
享樂主義

Question: I would like to know how Objectivism is different from hedonism, at least as far as morality is concerned. They seem very similar

2011-1-25
|
4 分鐘
The American Enlightenment's Other Side

The big influences on Hamilton were the economists he read and also the philosophers of natural law and English constitutional law....

Oct 22, 2010
|
12 分鐘
Thomas Paine's Influence on Ayn Rand

To my knowledge, Ayn Rand came somewhat independently to her own views. She may have imbibed Paine second-hand through such Old-Right

Sep 30, 2010
|
2 分鐘

Promovemos el objetivismo abierto: la filosofía de la razón, el logro, el individualismo y la libertad.